tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253758126327765896.post8415926433623683048..comments2008-07-14T13:00:40.664-04:00Brienhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02323472463759172879brienc@gmail.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253758126327765896.post-81325995951725771582008-07-14T13:00:40.664-04:002008-07-14T13:00:40.664-04:00Oh no! The ACC Bias fades even more. Hopefully Clark Kellogg won't talk up the Big Ten too much.<BR/><BR/>In all seriousness, anything is an improvement over Packer. I feel like he was only a year or two away from an EPIC old man misstatement. I do wish Gus Johnson could have been involved somehow though. The Kansas-Memphis finale has a much higher position on the all-time greatest games hierarchy if Gus calls it.J-Redhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10136082560788563357noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253758126327765896.post-28363140340184008262008-07-14T12:37:02.072-04:002008-07-14T12:37:02.072-04:00I couldnt agree more. I am not a huge fan of the proposed Nantz-Kellogg team, but at this point anything is better than listening to Packer for all the big games.michaelnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253758126327765896.post-71380322703642665362008-07-14T12:09:05.051-04:002008-07-14T12:09:05.051-04:00I'm thrilled to see Packer go. I can't say I have any great hopes for a Nantz-Kellogg booth (could they come up with a more vanilla announcing team?), but it will be refreshing to watch the Final Four without Packer.<BR/><BR/>He knows the game pretty well, but he would always find one or two points he wanted to make and then harp on them throughout the game.Brienhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02323472463759172879noreply@blogger.com